We believe that disclosing details would undermine the cyber security of our infrastructure. It would reveal information about our cyber security operations and architecture which would be useful to potential cyber-
attackers. We have therefore withheld this information in accordance with sections 31(1)(a) and (b) as well as
section 24(1) FOIA. These
are qualified exemptions and require a public interest test to be performed, as follows.
The NHS is aware of the increasing threat of cyber-crime to organisations, especially including high-profile organisations such as the NHS. With this in mind, we consider that disclosure of core architecture would prejudice
the prevention
and detection of crime (including cyber-crime) and also the apprehension and prosecution of offenders. Therefore,
this information is exempt by virtue of section 31(1)(a) and (b) FOIA. This is a qualified exemption and the public
interest test applies.
We accept there is a legitimate public interest in the effectiveness of measures being employed to keep the NHS
safe
and secure. This is especially important given that this infrastructure is maintained using public fund. However,
this is outweighed by the risks of criminal activity being undertaken if the information was disclosed. The release
of this
material could provide valuable information to those wishing to launch a cyber-attack against the Trust or the wider
NHS. Knowledge of the core architecture would allow potential cyber-attackers to build up a picture of our capability
and capacity in this area. It could provide those groups or individuals with an indication of where to focus their
efforts when targeting our systems. Groups planning attacks are known to conduct extensive research and will take
advantage of the ‘mosaic effect’ by combining information from different sources. If this information were to be combined with other information already in the public domain or obtained from elsewhere, the disclosure of it
could assist in mounting an effort to breach or bypass cyber security measures, with serious consequences for both staff and patients.
In these circumstances it is our view that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public
interest
in disclosing the information.
Section 24(1) – National security
In addition to the increased threats and incidents of cyber-crime, national security is also increasingly under threat from those organisations and individuals who seek to use technology to disrupt the workings of public bodies. To
limit these risks, we are also withholding the information for the purpose of safeguarding national security. This information is therefore also exempt by virtue of section 24(1) FOIA. This is a qualified exemption and the public interest test applies.
Again, we accept there is a legitimate public interest in the effectiveness of measures being employed to keep the
NHS safe and secure. This is especially important given that this infrastructure is maintained using public funds.
However, we consider that it is not in the wider public interest to disclose this information because, as well as the
risk posed to the security of the NHS, there is also a risk of national security being compromised. Knowledge of the core architecture would allow potential cyber-attackers to build up a picture of our capability and capacity in this
area. It
could provide those groups or individuals with an indication of where to focus their efforts when targeting our
systems. Groups planning attacks are known to conduct extensive research and will take advantage of the ‘mosaic effect’ by combining information from different sources. If this information were to be combined with other information already
in the public domain or obtained from elsewhere, the disclosure of it could assist in mounting an effort to breach
or bypass cyber security measures, with serious consequences. As the NHS is an essential part of the UK’s public
health
and emergency response and these security measures also protect the proper functioning of Category One
Emergency provision, the disclosure of this information may also compromise national security.
In these circumstances it is our view that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public
interest in disclosing the information.
